Explore the essentials of achieving and maintaining tax-exempt status under §501(c)(3), the operational and organizational tests, Form 990 compliance, and private foundation excise tax rules in the context of the Uniform CPA Examination (TCP).
Charitable organizations play a vital role in the U.S. tax landscape, providing public benefits while enjoying a range of tax advantages. For CPA candidates studying for the Tax Compliance and Planning (TCP) section of the Uniform CPA Examination, it is crucial to develop deep familiarity with Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §501(c)(3), the classification of charitable organizations, annual reporting obligations such as Form 990, and the additional compliance considerations for private foundations.
This section covers:
• The formation requirements and guiding principles for §501(c)(3) entities.
• The organizational and operational tests.
• How an IRS determination letter is obtained and maintained.
• The differences between public charities and private foundations.
• Annual reporting obligations (Form 990).
• Complex excise taxes that apply specifically to private foundations.
Throughout this chapter, we will draw on the broader framework of tax law covered in previous chapters and incorporate best practices and real-world scenarios to provide clarity. Strong proficiency in these topics is essential not only for the CPA exam but also for practical tax compliance work.
A charitable organization recognized under IRC §501(c)(3) is granted exemption from federal income tax. Qualifying activities typically involve religious, educational, scientific, literary, or other charitable purposes. The “charitable” scope in the tax code also includes activities addressing public safety testing, fostering national or international amateur sports, and preventing cruelty to children or animals.
The tax exemption can translate into significant financial advantages:
• Income tax exemption.
• Eligibility to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions (subject to donor limitations under IRC §170).
• Possible exemption from certain state and local taxes (sales tax, property tax) where applicable.
To qualify, the organization must satisfy the Organizational Test and the Operational Test. Both tests must be met continuously throughout the entity’s existence. Failure to meet these requirements can lead to revocation of tax-exempt status.
Under the Organizational Test, the entity’s founding documents (Articles of Incorporation, Trust Agreement, or other relevant formation document) must limit the organization’s purposes to those described in §501(c)(3). In other words:
A typical pitfalls occur when the founding documents are either silent or contain overly broad clauses that allow for unqualified activities. For instance, the phrase “to engage in any lawful activity” in some corporate charters may jeopardize the qualification unless carefully addressed by referencing appropriate limitations for §501(c)(3).
Once it is properly organized, the entity must operate exclusively for exempt purposes:
• Exclusively Exempt Activities: The organization’s primary operations must further one or more of the stated charitable purposes in §501(c)(3).
• Private Benefit Prohibition: Any monetary or in-kind benefits must not inure to private shareholders or individuals. Use of funds to excessively compensate insiders or to distribute profits to private individuals can result in violation of the private inurement doctrine.
• No Substantial Lobbying: While limited lobbying activities for legislation relevant to the mission may be permissible, it cannot amount to a “substantial part” of the organization’s activities.
• Strict Prohibition on Campaign Intervention: The IRS forbids §501(c)(3) organizations from contributing to political campaigns on behalf of (or in opposition to) candidates for public office.
The Operational Test is sometimes subject to professional judgment. The IRS looks at the organization’s main revenue-generating activities (Is it mostly from charitable grants, membership dues, or admissions to educational programs?), how funds are disbursed, and whether the organization’s resources substantially further its exempt purposes.
To obtain formal recognition, an organization typically files Form 1023 (or the streamlined Form 1023-EZ for eligible smaller organizations) with the IRS. Applicants provide detailed information on their activities, governing documents, past and projected budgets, and written narratives explaining how the organization furthers charitable purposes.
Key steps often include:
• Draft Bylaws & Articles of Incorporation carefully.
• Ensure the paperwork addresses the dissolution clause and adheres to permissible activities.
• Pay attention to the IRS sample language for charitable organizations.
• Submit organizational documents as part of Form 1023, including financial data and a description of activities.
Once approved, the IRS issues a Determination Letter confirming the exempt status. However, the letter’s validity depends on ongoing compliance. To maintain §501(c)(3) status, the organization must:
• Annually file Form 990 or an appropriate variant (Form 990-EZ or 990-N) unless specifically exempt from the filing requirement (e.g., certain religious organizations).
• Follow the private inurement prohibition.
• Limit lobbying activities and adhere to the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
• Ensure it remains primarily engaged in furthering its exempt purposes.
Violations can trigger IRS examinations or revocation of exempt status, along with potential liability for back taxes, fines, and penalties.
Under IRC §509, all §501(c)(3) organizations are, by default, classified as private foundations unless they can demonstrate qualification as a public charity. Public charities typically receive a broad base of support from the general public or government sources, while private foundations are often funded by a single individual, family, or small group.
Common public charity classifications include:
• IRC §509(a)(1): Organizations receiving substantial support from gifts, grants, or contributions from the general public or governmental units.
• IRC §509(a)(2): Organizations that receive most of their support from a combination of contributions and revenues from exempt activities.
• IRC §509(a)(3): Supporting organizations that exist to support other public charities.
Public charities are subject to fewer restrictions and excise taxes than private foundations. Private foundations, on the other hand, are subject to additional rules intended to prevent abuse and ensure that philanthropic dollars are used to benefit society at large.
When an entity is unable to demonstrate that it is publicly supported, it is treated as a private foundation. Typically financed by a small circle of donors, private foundations have certain regulatory requirements designed to encourage charitable giving and limit potential abuse:
Private foundations must annually distribute (in the form of grants or certain other qualifying distributions) at least 5% of their non-charitable-use assets. This rule ensures that philanthropic dollars are put to active charitable use rather than stored indefinitely in investment accounts.
Private foundations are prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with disqualified persons (e.g., officers, directors, substantial contributors, owners of significant interests in corporate donors). Self-dealing can include the sale or lease of property, lending of money, or furnishing services between the foundation and disqualified persons. Violations trigger vigorous excise taxes.
The law limits a private foundation’s ownership share in business enterprises. Generally, a foundation and its disqualified persons combined may not control more than 20% of a for-profit business (with certain limited exceptions).
Private foundations must manage their investment portfolio prudently to avoid investments that put the foundation’s assets at risk for non-charitable purposes. An example might be speculative or overly risky investments not aligned with recognized fiduciary standards.
Private foundations face tight rules regarding expenditures for lobbying, political campaigns, or grants made without due diligence. Transfers to non-501(c)(3) organizations that are not properly monitored can result in taxable expenditures.
Unlike public charities, private foundations face several specialized excise taxes under the IRC. Key ones include:
Given these complexities, private foundations must pay careful attention to annual excise tax filings and compliance requirements, as the penalties can be severe.
Most §501(c)(3) organizations, whether public charities or private foundations, must file an annual information return that discloses financial activities, governance structures, and compensation to key staff. The primary forms are:
• Form 990: For large charitable organizations with gross receipts ≥ $200,000 or total assets ≥ $500,000.
• Form 990-EZ: For smaller organizations with gross receipts < $200,000 and total assets < $500,000.
• Form 990-PF: Mandatory for all private foundations, regardless of asset size.
• Form 990-N (e-Postcard): For the smallest organizations with annual gross receipts ≤ $50,000.
Timely filing of the appropriate form is critical:
• Due Date: The return is due by the 15th day of the fifth month after the close of the organization’s tax year (e.g., May 15 for calendar-year filers).
• Extensions: An automatic 6-month extension is available by filing Form 8868.
• Noncompliance: Failure to file for three consecutive years automatically results in revocation of tax-exempt status.
In addition to filing an annual return, diligent record-keeping of revenues, expenses, and charitable activities is critical. For further details on record-keeping best practices and the compliance environment, see Chapter 21 on IRS Practice & Procedure.
Below are several scenarios that highlight key compliance issues that may appear in exam questions or real-world practice:
• Scenario A: A family foundation invests heavily in a single technology startup in which the founder’s spouse holds a 30% ownership interest. This scenario raises potential self-dealing and excess business holdings concerns. A prudent approach involves actively divesting excess shares to comply with the 20% ownership limit within the grace period.
• Scenario B: A newly formed charitable organization includes broad “any lawful purpose” language in its Articles of Incorporation. The IRS requests amendments clarifying that the organization’s scope is limited to charitable and educational pursuits, demonstrating how critical precise language is for the Organizational Test.
• Scenario C: A local non-profit museum organizes an advocacy campaign urging legislators to pass a funding bill for the arts. The time and resources used for lobbying come under scrutiny. The museum must track how much staff time is devoted to lobbying to ensure it is not a “substantial part” of activities.
To illustrate the relationship between different exempt classification paths under the IRS rules, consider the following mermaid diagram. The diagram highlights the initial classification under §501(c)(3) and the default categorization as a private foundation unless the organization meets the public support tests.
flowchart TB
A[Incorporate Under State Law] --> B[Organize to Pursue Charitable Purposes]
B --> C[Apply for IRS Recognition via Form 1023]
C --> D((IRS Determination))
D --> E[No Public Support Test Met<br>→ Private Foundation]
D --> F[Meets Public Support Test<br>→ Public Charity]
As the diagram shows, the default classification for a §501(c)(3) organization is “private foundation” unless it can show it meets the public support test. This classification is not permanent: the organization can change classification if its support base changes substantially over time.
• Robust Bylaws and Formation Documents: Incorporating the correct purpose and dissolution language from the start simplifies the determination process.
• Comprehensive Grantmaking Procedures for Foundations: Implement a robust process to vet grant recipients and maintain detailed records of how funds are used.
• Avoid Political Activity: Even inadvertent campaign participation could compromise an organization’s exempt status.
• Separate Powers: Avoid conflicts of interest by clearly delineating roles and duties among board members and officers.
• Routinely Review Public Support Ratios: An organization that anticipates drifting into private foundation status should regularly perform the public support test calculations.
• Track Lobbying Expenditures: Although certain public charities may make a 501(h) election to calculate lobbying under expenditure-based limits, they must still remain cautious about crossing the threshold of “substantial lobbying.”
• Publication 557, “Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization,” by the IRS.
• Treasury Regulations §1.501(c)(3)-1 on the Organizational and Operational Tests.
• IRS Guidance on Private Foundations and Form 990-PF instructions.
• Chapter 21 of this text: “Practice & Procedure.”
• Online courses on non-profit formation and management; for instance, certain continuing education offerings from AICPA or other professional associations.
TCP CPA Hardest Mock Exams: In-Depth & Clear Explanations
Tax Compliance & Planning (TCP) CPA Mocks: 6 Full (1,500 Qs), Harder Than Real! In-Depth & Clear. Crush With Confidence!
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is for educational and preparatory purposes only.