A comprehensive guide to partnership- vs. partner-level tax elections, including the selection of a tax year and Section 754 basis adjustments in U.S. partnerships.
In a partnership, multiple levels of tax elections might come into play: those made at the partnership level and those made separately by each partner. This section delves into how U.S. federal tax rules apply to determining a partnership’s tax year and how basis adjustments—including Section 754 elections—work. By understanding these elections, CPAs can ensure accurate compliance, optimize tax efficiency, and prevent costly errors.
In U.S. taxation, a partnership is a “flow-through” or “pass-through” entity. This means the partnership itself generally does not pay federal income tax (with some exceptions); rather, it computes its income, deductions, and credits, and then allocates these amounts among all partners. Certain key elections, however, are made by the partnership as a distinct entity, while others are made individually by partners. Recognizing which election applies at which level—and how that impacts individual partner transactions—remains a cornerstone of effective tax planning and compliance.
• Partnership-Level Elections: These are decisions the partnership makes for the entity as a whole. Examples include electing the partnership’s tax year, choosing an accounting method (e.g., cash vs. accrual), and deciding whether to make a Section 754 election to adjust the basis of partnership property.
• Partner-Level Elections: These are decisions each partner makes individually on their own tax return. For example, a partner may choose to capitalize or expense certain costs if the items are allowable, or decide how to treat various credits that pass through from the partnership. Although partners are bound by entity-level elections in many respects (because they must report the allocated share of partnership items consistently), they may still make individual choices regarding the characterization and treatment of some flow-through items on their own returns.
One of the most fundamental elections at the partnership level is the selection of a taxable year—effectively, which 12-month period (or other allowable period) the partnership will use for tax reporting. Under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), partnerships must adhere to specific rules when choosing their tax year. The IRS generally seeks to minimize deferral of income by requiring that a partnership adopt:
Partnerships that do not naturally qualify to adopt a particular tax year under the rules above may elect under IRC Section 444 to adopt a taxable year that is different from the required tax year, but only by a limited amount of deferral. Section 444 generally restricts the partnership to a maximum three-month deferral, and in many cases, the partnership may have to make required payments or deposits (“required payment” provisions under IRC Section 7519) to mitigate any potential deferral advantages.
Below are some frequently encountered partnership-level elections:
• Accounting Method Election: While many smaller partnerships may choose the cash method, others might be required to use accrual if they exceed certain gross receipts thresholds or deal with specific types of inventory.
• Section 754 Election: This pertains to adjusting the inside basis (the partnership’s basis in its assets) to match the outside basis (the partner’s basis in the partnership interest) under certain conditions (discussed in detail below).
• Depreciation Methods and Special Elections: The partnership can elect how to depreciate certain property, such as choosing the alternative depreciation system (ADS) or applying bonus depreciation.
• Organizational Expenses Election: Under IRC Section 709(b), the partnership can elect to immediately deduct up to a certain amount of organizational expenditures, with the remainder amortized over 180 months.
These elections, once made, generally must be applied consistently across the entire partnership. Any changes often require the partnership to request IRS permission or meet certain criteria for an automatic change in accounting method.
• Deduction vs. Capitalization of Certain Costs: Individual partners may determine whether certain costs passed through to them from the partnership are currently deductible on their own returns or must be capitalized.
• Charitable Contributions and Tax Credits: Where the partnership passes through a charitable contribution, it is ultimately up to each partner to reflect that contribution on their own return and comply with any special rules regarding limitations or carryforwards.
• Foreign Tax Credit vs. Deduction: If the partnership pays foreign taxes and allocates a share of these taxes to partners, each partner can choose whether to claim a foreign tax credit or deduct the taxes paid, subject to the partner’s specific tax situation.
Key point: Although the partnership computes the total amount of income, deduction, or credit for each of these items, the partner individually decides how to treat and report them. That means each partner’s overall tax strategy can vary based on individual elections, even while bound by the partnership’s overall treatment of partnership items.
One of the most critical decisions a partnership can make is the Section 754 election. This election helps align (or “true up”) the inside basis of partnership assets with the outside basis of a transferee partner’s interest or with certain distributions. Typically, inside basis and outside basis diverge when a partner buys a partnership interest from another partner, or when a partner passes away and their heirs receive a stepped-up basis in the partnership interest.
The Section 754 election has two key components under the regulations:
A Section 754 election can greatly benefit both the transferring partner (or their estate) and the acquiring partner by helping ensure the acquirer has a fair depreciation/amortization base going forward. Without this election, the new partner might experience distorted tax outcomes (for example, continuing depreciation schedules that are significantly different from the new partner’s outside basis).
Example: • Assume Partner A bought their partnership interest 10 years ago at $100,000. The partner’s outside basis is $100,000, and the partnership’s inside basis in its asset is $60,000 (due to depreciation). • Now Partner A sells their interest to Partner B for $140,000. Partner B’s outside basis is $140,000, but the partnership’s inside basis remains $60,000. • If the partnership does not adopt a Section 754 election, Partner B might be underrepresenting future depreciation benefits or might face a potential mismatch in the recognition of gains or losses. With a Section 754 election, the partnership can adjust the inside basis upwards for Partner B’s share, aligning with Partner B’s $140,000 outside basis.
A partnership can make or revoke a Section 754 election through a statement attached to its timely filed tax return (including extensions). Once made, the election usually applies to all future transactions unless the partnership obtains IRS approval to revoke it.
Under Section 743(b), upon a sale or exchange of a partnership interest or upon a partner’s death, the partnership calculates an additional basis adjustment specific to that transferee partner.
• Increase or Decrease in Basis: The adjustment can be positive (increase) or negative (decrease) depending on whether the transferee’s outside basis differs from their share of the partnership’s inside basis.
• Tracking: The adjustment is tracked only with respect to the transferee partner, meaning the other partners are generally unaffected.
Under Section 734(b), the partnership can adjust its asset bases when it makes a distribution that triggers recognition of gain or loss. For instance, if a partner receives a property distribution and recognizes gain due to receiving property in excess of their basis, the partnership’s remaining property basis can be adjusted upward or downward. This adjustment applies to the partnership as a whole (benefiting only the partners remaining after the distribution).
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating how a Section 754 election aligns inside and outside basis for a transferee partner.
flowchart LR A["Partner Sells <br/> Interest"] B["Buyer (Transferee) <br/> Receives Partnership Interest"] C["Outside Basis of Buyer <br/> = Purchase Price"] D["Inside Basis of Partnership Assets <br/> Remains Unchanged Initially"] E["Section 754 Election"] F["743(b) Adjustment <br/> Aligns Inside Basis <br/> for New Partner"] A --> B B --> C B --> D D --> E E --> F
Explanation:
• A partner (the “seller”) disposes of their partnership interest.
• The buyer (or transferee) receives the interest and has an outside basis equal to what they paid.
• The partnership’s inside basis has not changed solely because of the transfer.
• If the partnership has a valid Section 754 election in effect, the 743(b) adjustment realigns the inside basis (for the transferee only) to match the outside basis.
When a partnership interest is transferred, the amount of the Section 743(b) adjustment is determined as follows:
• Calculate the transferee partner’s outside basis in the partnership interest. This is typically the purchase price (or the fair market value of inheritance in a death scenario).
• Subtract from this amount the transferee’s share of the partnership’s inside basis in its assets (the portion allocated to that partner as if a liquidation occurred).
• The difference is the upward or downward adjustment that is allocated among the partnership’s properties in a manner consistent with the regulations, typically reflecting how the fair market value of the assets is allocated for the new partner’s interest.
While a Section 754 election can be beneficial, it adds administrative complexity. Each time a partner transfers an interest, the partnership must calculate the 743(b) adjustment for that transferee. Careful recordkeeping is crucial, especially if multiple partners transfer interests over time.
Once a Section 754 election is made, it generally remains in effect for all subsequent transactions. Partnerships may request IRS permission to revoke the election if they can show it results in substantial hardship. The process involves filing a timely request and paying a user fee.
Basis adjustments under Sections 743(b) or 734(b) may interact with the partnership’s Section 704(c) allocations for contributed property, and with other special rules for built-in gains and losses. Careful coordination is necessary to avoid double-counting or omitting amounts.
• Failing to attach the election statement to a timely filed return may invalidate the election for that year.
• Incorrectly allocating adjustments among partnership assets can lead to future depreciation or gain issues.
• Overlooking a partner-to-partner sale that triggers a required basis adjustment in a partnership that already has a Section 754 election.
• Complex multi-tier partnerships can create additional layers of compliance challenges.
• Evaluate Materiality: Partnerships may want to consider the potential benefit of a Section 754 election relative to the compliance cost. If the partnership anticipates frequent interest transfers or distributions that significantly affect partner basis, the election can be highly beneficial.
• Maintain Detailed Records: Partnerships with a 754 election must maintain detailed schedules tracking each partner’s share of inside basis as well as each transferee’s specific adjustments.
• Use Technology Tools: Many tax preparation software solutions streamline 754 tracking, but manual oversight is still recommended. Tools that generate partner-by-partner schedules are especially valuable.
• Review Partnership Agreements: The partnership agreement often addresses whether and when the partnership will make a Section 754 election, and how the costs of administration will be borne (e.g., by the incoming partner, the partnership at large, etc.).
Mark is a partner in MNO Partnership with an outside basis of $60,000. Mark sells his 25% partnership interest to Susan for $100,000. MNO Partnership holds assets with a total inside basis of $200,000 and a fair market value of $300,000. Susan’s share of the inside basis (based on the hypothetical liquidation approach) is $50,000 (25% of $200,000). Thus, the difference between Susan’s outside basis ($100,000 purchase price) and her share of the inside basis ($50,000) is $50,000.
If MNO Partnership has a Section 754 election in place, the partnership makes a $50,000 743(b) basis adjustment. This adjustment only affects the assets Susan is deemed to own, aligning her share of the inside basis with her outside basis. The other partners see no change to their inside basis. Over time, Susan benefits from additional depreciation, amortization, or reduced gain on later dispositions of partnership property that reflect this $50,000 upward adjustment.
• Internal Revenue Code §§ 703, 704, 706, 734, 743, 754, 761
• Treasury Regulations §§ 1.703, 1.704, 1.706, 1.734, 1.743, 1.754
• IRS Publication 541, Partnerships
• Chapter 21.3 “Partner’s Basis Computations, Recourse & Nonrecourse Debt” for the computation of outside basis.
• Chapter 21.4 “Transactions Between a Partner and Partnership” for further insights on transfers and property contributions.
Taxation & Regulation (REG) CPA Mocks: 6 Full (1,500 Qs), Harder Than Real! In-Depth & Clear. Crush With Confidence!
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is for educational and preparatory purposes only.