Learn essential safeguards for cash management through robust internal controls, lockbox arrangements, segregation of duties, and disclosures for transparency in financial statements.
Effective management and safeguarding of cash are critical for all types of entities. Given cash’s highly liquid nature, strong internal controls deter theft, mitigate fraud, and ensure accurate financial reporting. This section expands upon the key aspects of establishing robust controls over cash receipts and disbursements. It also covers recommended practices regarding lockbox arrangements and the proper disclosures entities should make in their financial statements. From a CPA exam perspective, you must thoroughly understand fundamental control mechanisms and be able to identify weaknesses in processes designed to protect cash and ensure well-supported footnote disclosures.
Cash is the most liquid asset on an entity’s balance sheet, making it the most susceptible to misappropriation. Inadequate cash control frequently paves the way for:
• Misuse or fraudulent diversion of cash.
• Overstated or understated cash balances.
• Failure to recognize or record legitimate transactions.
• Inaccurate financial statements and loss of stakeholder confidence.
By implementing strong controls—spanning from physical safeguards to policy-level governance—organizations fortify themselves against such risks, ensuring that reported cash balances are both accurate and protected.
Below are essential elements and best practices that organizations typically consider when developing and implementing a robust cash management system.
Physical access to cash must be limited and carefully monitored. Common procedures include:
• Locking cash in secure boxes, vaults, or cash registers.
• Deploying security cameras in cash-handling areas.
• Using locked cabinets and restricted access doors.
Maintaining surveillance and restricting contact with cash is a cornerstone preventive measure.
Segregation of duties ensures no single individual has excessive control over critical aspects of the cash handling process. Generally, the following duties should be allocated to different employees (or multiple teams in larger organizations):
Where a complete segregation of duties is challenging—such as in small businesses—compensating controls (like frequent cross-reviews or monthly external reconciliations) can reduce fraud risk.
A lockbox arrangement is a cash collection service offered by banks for businesses. Customers send their payments directly to a specified post-office box accessible only by the bank. The bank:
This setup reduces the handling of checks directly by company personnel, minimizing theft and accelerating the availability of funds. Lockbox arrangements are especially beneficial for companies handling a high volume of customer check payments.
Below is a conceptual diagram illustrating a simplified lockbox process:
flowchart LR A[Customer Mails Payment] --> B[Lockbox (Bank PO Box)] B --> C[Bank Collects Check] C --> D[Deposit to Company's Bank Account] D --> E[Bank Sends Deposit Info to Company] E --> F[Company Reconciles & Updates Accounting Records]
Here, the bank acts as the intermediary, mitigating the risk of internal manipulation of checks, while also improving the speed and accuracy of deposits.
To reduce the possibility of theft, many organizations minimize the amount of physical cash on hand. Examples include:
• Encouraging digital transactions.
• Limiting petty cash accounts and replenishing them strategically.
• Setting strict petty cash ceilings.
Greater reliance on electronic payments also offers a clearer audit trail due to bank or third-party payment processor records.
Performing unannounced cash counts, especially for petty cash or cash registers, can deter fraudulent behavior. Periodic surprise audits:
• Verify that recorded balances align with physical cash.
• Detect employee malfeasance or simple bookkeeping mistakes.
• Reinforce a heightened respect for established internal controls.
Monthly (or more frequent) reconciliations detect discrepancies between recorded transactions and actual bank statements. Entities compare general ledger accounts for cash to external statements provided by financial institutions. Any differences found during this process typically arise from:
• Outstanding checks.
• Deposits in transit.
• Bank errors.
• Unauthorized withdrawals or checks.
Careful, prompt resolution of these items helps keep records up-to-date and flags irregularities or fraud.
The disclosures around cash ensure transparency for investors, creditors, and other financial statement users. While Chapter 3 outlines notes and significant accounting policy disclosures more broadly, the following cash-specific items typically arise:
Entities may have cash that is focused toward specific obligations—such as debt covenants or capital projects—thereby restricting its usage. Recognition and disclosure considerations include:
• Presenting restricted cash separately from unrestricted cash on the balance sheet if the restriction is material.
• Describing in footnotes the nature, terms, and duration of those restrictions.
• Reclassifying restricted cash out of current assets if the restriction extends beyond one year.
Under U.S. GAAP, ASC 230 clarifies the classification of restricted cash flows in the statement of cash flows. IFRS has similar principles but may differ slightly in presentation requirements.
Banks or creditors sometimes require companies to maintain a minimum balance in an account as a condition for borrowing arrangements. Known as a compensating balance, it is effectively restricted cash. Footnote disclosures should specify:
• The existence of the arrangement and the minimum required balance.
• The amount of cash restricted.
• Any related contractual or legal ramifications.
This helps users understand the true liquidity position of the company.
In some situations, cash accounts are used as collateral for loans. Companies must disclose:
• The nature of the collateral arrangement.
• Potential exposures if the company defaults on the loan.
Overdrafts may be netted against cash on the balance sheet if the bank has a legally enforceable right of offset and the company intends to execute that right. Otherwise, it is recorded as a liability. Disclosures should clarify:
• The extent of overdraft usage.
• Agreements that permit offset in certain conditions.
In rare cases, entities offset bank account balances if they meet the enforceable right of offset criteria under ASC 210-20 for U.S. GAAP. If applied, the financial statements must clearly describe:
• The nature of the offset agreement.
• Potential timing issues or significant uncertainties.
Consider a midsize retail chain collecting daily cash sales across multiple store locations. To mitigate risk, the retailer employs:
• Daily deposit policy: Store managers must deposit all sales at the end of each day.
• Segregation of duties: One associate counts the register, and another manager verifies the count before sealing that day’s deposit bag.
• Keycards: Employees must use keycards to access the safe.
• Bank reconciliation: Accounting staff reconcile deposits in transit and bank statements weekly.
• Surprise internal audits: Corporate auditors arrive unannounced to verify store cash counts.
In disclosures, the company highlights:
These measures combine to ensure daily accountability, reduce unauthorized activity, and provide external parties a transparent view of the company’s cash management policies and obligations.
While many organizations strive for robust cash controls, pitfalls remain. Typical issues include:
• Inadequate segregation of duties when budgets or staff are limited.
• Overreliance on manual processes, raising risks of error and deliberate manipulation.
• Lack of timely reconciliations allowing discrepancies to remain undetected.
• Insufficient oversight of remote or satellite locations.
• Unclear or inconsistent disclosures masking liquidity constraints (e.g., restricted cash).
Addressing these vulnerabilities includes automating portions of the cash handling process, centralizing cash management where possible, and consistently applying internal policies across all markets or business units.
The following flowchart summarizes best practices of cash controls, from receiving payments to reconciling bank statements:
flowchart TB A[Payment Received (Check or Cash)] --> B[Record Preliminary Receipt] B --> C[Segregation: Bookkeeper Posts to GL] B --> D[Custodian Takes Physical Custody] D --> E[Physical Safeguards (Safe/Vault/Lockbox)] E --> F[Deposit to Bank] F --> G[Bank Statement Issues Periodically] G --> H[Accounting Reconciliation] H --> I[Management Review & Oversight]
Below is an excerpt of a hypothetical footnote disclosure on cash, highlighting restricted balances and compensating balances:
• Note X: Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all unrestricted, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 20XX, cash and cash equivalents comprised:
This type of disclosure ensures users comprehend that not all cash shown on the balance sheet is readily available for day-to-day operations.
FAR CPA Hardest Mock Exams: In-Depth & Clear Explanations
Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR) CPA Mocks: 6 Full (1,500 Qs), Harder Than Real! In-Depth & Clear. Crush With Confidence!
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is for educational and preparatory purposes only.