Learn how to effectively plan and distribute study hours for the BAR exam with proven strategies and real-world examples.
Effective time allocation is one of the most critical factors in successfully preparing for the Business Analysis and Reporting (BAR) section of the Uniform CPA Examination. Whether you are working full-time, recently graduated, or balancing personal commitments, you need a flexible yet structured plan to address every facet of the BAR syllabus. This section provides a practical framework and tested tools to help you prioritize your study hours and optimize your chances of success.
Having already explored foundational concepts throughout the book—from Financial Statement Analysis (Chapter 4) and Managerial/Cost Accounting Essentials (Chapter 5) to Governmental Accounting (Chapters 19–22)—you now face the final challenge of ensuring broad coverage of all necessary content while efficiently managing your review time. The tips and strategies offered here aim to help you build a high-impact schedule, reduce the risk of last-minute cramming, and concentrate on the most vital areas that tend to appear in the BAR exam.
The BAR portion of the CPA exam tests a broad range of knowledge, from traditional financial accounting fundamentals to more advanced analytical techniques and reporting standards. To effectively allocate your time, it is helpful to list and categorize these topics before beginning formal study. Consider referencing the main sections from this guide:
• Part II (Business Analysis): Financial Statement Analysis, Cost Accounting, Non-Financial/Non-GAAP Measures, Budgeting, Forecasting, and Valuation Techniques.
• Part III (Technical Accounting and Reporting): Indefinite-Lived Intangibles, Revenue Recognition, Stock-Based Compensation, Derivatives, Consolidations, and more.
• Part IV (State and Local Government Accounting): Fund structures, conversion streams, reconciliations, and specialized transactions.
Within each chapter and subchapter, pinpoint the high-priority concepts that frequently appear in exam questions (e.g., ratio analysis trends, the five-step revenue recognition model in ASC 606, or IFRS vs. U.S. GAAP differences). A practical strategy is to highlight those sections in your study materials and designate them as “priority topics” in your study schedule.
A common mistake is to devote the same amount of time to every chapter, which could mean overemphasizing less frequently tested areas while underestimating the complexity of more critical concepts. Instead, consider a weighted approach that tailors your study to the importance and complexity of each topic.
Assign weight to each topic based on:
Prioritize coverage of areas where you have minimal background or recent exposure.
Use the weighting system to set weekly or bi-weekly targets.
Below is a sample table illustrating a 7-week schedule for BAR. The “Time Allocation” column is a recommendation based on topic weightings and complexity.
Topic Category | Time Allocation (Approx.) | Weighting Rationale |
---|---|---|
Financial Statement Analysis (Ch. 4) | 15% of total study time | High frequency on the BAR, requires ratio calculations, trend analysis, etc. |
Cost/Managerial Accounting (Ch. 5) | 15% of total study time | Critical to demonstrating business analysis; variances often tested extensively. |
Non-Financial/Non-GAAP & Budgeting (Ch. 6 & Ch. 7) | 10% of total study time | Moderately tested; often integrated with finance or operational case studies. |
Advanced Reporting (Revenue, Stock Comp, etc.) | 20% of total study time | Critical and dense; revenue recognition under ASC 606 and stock-based comp are core. |
Governmental Accounting (Ch. 19–22) | 15% of total study time | Typically appears in multiple-choice and simulation; requires specialized rules. |
Valuation and Analytics (Ch. 9, plus analytics) | 15% of total study time | Involves NPV/IRR calculations, synergy valuation, real options, plus data analysis. |
Final Review, Mocks, and Weak Areas | 10% of total study time | Time to consolidate findings, complete final simulations, and revisit tough topics. |
This distribution is only one example and should be tailored to your specific goals and strengths. For instance, if you find Governmental Accounting particularly challenging, you might allocate 20% instead of 15% to that segment.
Before you set your final study schedule, assess your baseline. Take a set of diagnostic practice tests or short quizzes covering the main BAR topic areas. By evaluating your results, you can objectively determine which chapters need additional attention.
• Look for patterns in your diagnostic scores. If you struggle significantly with advanced reporting areas like stock-based compensation or derivatives, note that you should increase focus in those topics.
• For each topic, ask yourself whether you missed conceptual questions or calculation-intensive ones. This insight helps you prioritize areas for deeper review.
• Make it a practice to periodically re-test yourself on the same topics to see if your grasp has improved.
Below is a simple flowchart illustrating how you can use diagnostic tests to inform and iterate on your time allocation:
flowchart LR A["List of BAR Topics"] --> B["Identify Strengths and Weaknesses <br/> Through Diagnostic Tests"] B --> C["Allocate Time <br/> Using Weighted Priorities"] C --> D["Review & Practice <br/> (Continuous Improvement)"]
While reading textbooks and notes is essential, investing time in practical exercises can lead to deeper retention. Practical exercises include:
• Working through Task-Based Simulations (TBS) that address multiple steps of the accounting cycle or complex IFRS vs. U.S. GAAP reconciliation.
• Performing ratio analysis on real-world financial statements, applying knowledge from Chapters 4 and 6.
• Creating “mini-forecasts” and budgets (from Chapter 7) for hypothetical companies, including sensitivity analyses.
• Reviewing real public company filings to identify intangible asset disclosures, revenue recognition notes, and segment reporting structures (Chapters 10–12 and 17).
These hands-on tasks not only help you retain theoretical content but also develop the application skills crucial for the BAR exam’s higher-order tasks.
Given the volume of material in the BAR exam, a perpetual challenge is achieving the right balance between covering every single detail (depth) and ensuring you do not miss entire topics (breadth). Consider the following balancing strategies:
• Focus on the big-picture frameworks first. For instance, master the conceptual approach to analyzing goodwill impairment (Chapter 10) even if you cannot memorize every numeric threshold in ASC 350.
• If you have limited time in the final weeks, concentrate on areas you have repeatedly struggled with, then refresh your familiarity with less-challenging material.
• Use mind maps or quick reference sheets (see Chapter 27 for Key Formulas, Ratios, and Quick Reference) to revisit major points quickly.
Time-block scheduling involves dividing your day or week into dedicated periods for specific tasks. For instance, you might focus on advanced reporting for two hours in the morning, followed by a one-hour lunch break, then a two-hour session on governmental accounting in the afternoon. Apply these best practices to maximize your results:
• Schedule your most challenging topics during your peak productivity times—often mid-morning for many people.
• Alternate topics to maintain focus. For instance, pair a conceptual subject like Non-GAAP measures (Chapter 6) with a more calculation-driven topic like cost accounting (Chapter 5).
• Reward yourself with short breaks or transitions after tackling complex materials.
• Track your time spent daily or weekly, and hold yourself accountable for meeting allocated goals.
Leverage technology to make your self-study process more efficient:
• Calendar and To-Do Apps: Tools like Google Calendar or Trello for day-to-day scheduling and tracking smaller tasks.
• Spreadsheet Dashboards: Create a simple dashboard in Excel or Google Sheets to log hours studied per topic and measure your progress.
• Mobile Flashcard Apps: Revisit key formulas, definitions, or IFRS–U.S. GAAP differences even when you have only a few spare minutes.
• Online Mock Platforms: Practice with high-yield question banks and AI-based learning solutions that adapt to your performance.
Your plan should remain dynamic. If you discover that you have greatly underestimated the difficulty of a particular subtopic—like, say, the complexities of embedded derivatives (Chapter 15)—shift your schedule and devote more hours to that or consider seeking extra resources.
It helps to set weekly or bi-weekly “checkpoints” to reassess. At each checkpoint, ask:
Below is an example of how you might structure an 8-week BAR study plan, assuming you have roughly 15–20 hours per week to dedicate:
• Week 1:
• Week 2:
• Week 3:
• Week 4:
• Week 5:
• Week 6:
• Week 7:
• Week 8:
This plan is not prescriptive; it simply illustrates how time allocations might be organized around core topics, problem sets, and simulation practice in a progressive manner.
Imagine a candidate, Ally, who spent the first four weeks of her study plan focusing heavily on financial statement analysis and revenue recognition. By the mid-point of Week 5, she started taking full-length mock exams. Reviewing her performance, she realized that she consistently struggled with:
• Governmental Accounting’s intricacies around funds and reconciliations.
• Variance analysis in Cost Accounting, especially overhead allocations.
She decided to reallocate an additional 5% of her total weekly study hours for the remainder of her plan to these areas, reducing the time she had initially set aside for intangible assets (where she was performing relatively well). This pivot better aligned her focus with her evolving needs.
• Overcommitting to a Single Topic: Spending 50% of study time on advanced accounting standards might jeopardize coverage of broad areas like budgeting, forecasting, or government-wide statements.
• Last-Minute Cramming: Waiting until the final weeks to tackle heavy topics like derivative accounting or capital budgeting tools often leads to incomplete mastery.
• Ignoring Self-Assessment: Without frequent quizzes, it’s hard to measure knowledge gaps. Many candidates who forgo ongoing self-assessment end up surprised by weaknesses too late in the process.
• Insufficient Practice on Calculation-Heavy Content: Neglecting practice for NPV calculations, ratio analysis, or scenario-based budgeting can lead to time pressure during the exam.
• Make incremental progress each day, and track your hours.
• Use color-coded notes or spreadsheets to visualize your strongest and weakest areas.
• Balance question drill sessions with reading and note-taking for robust conceptual understanding.
• Systematically review your earlier chapters’ notes at least once every two weeks to avoid “topic drift.”
• Enlist a study partner or mentor if possible, to compare progress and exchange targeted resources.
By thoughtfully designing your study schedule, and continuously refining it based on performance feedback, you can tackle the BAR section more confidently and efficiently. Striking the right balance between coverage and depth, and devoting adequate time to your most challenging areas, will give you the best chance of meeting—or exceeding—your target score.
Business Analysis and Reporting (BAR) CPA Mocks: 6 Full (1,500 Qs), Harder Than Real! In-Depth & Clear. Crush With Confidence!
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is for educational and preparatory purposes only.