Learn how state and local governments handle budgetary accounts, record encumbrances, and manage lapsing vs. nonlapsing appropriations in financial statements.
Budgetary accounting is a cornerstone of governmental financial management, ensuring that public funds are spent according to legally adopted budgets. Unlike in for-profit entities, where budgetary oversight is chiefly an internal control mechanism, governmental entities must comply with statutory budget requirements. This compliance framework is central to transparency, accountability, and stewardship of taxpayer resources. In this section, we will explore how budgets are recorded in state and local government accounting systems, emphasize the importance of encumbrances, and discuss the difference between lapsing and nonlapsing appropriations.
Budgetary accounting in government organizations aims to:
• Respect legally adopted spending limitations known as appropriations.
• Provide a control mechanism so that expenditures do not exceed authorized levels.
• Record and track encumbrances—commitments to spend—that help in preventing overspending.
• Reflect the practical reality of how government entities plan, authorize, and manage public funds.
Whereas private entities typically do not incorporate budgets directly into their formal accounting records, governmental funds often include “self-balancing” budgetary accounts to monitor compliance. This approach supports the information needs of citizens, legislators, and oversight bodies.
Governmental funds commonly track budgets using a set of accounts separate from the conventional asset, liability, revenue, and expenditure accounts. These budgetary accounts include:
• Estimated Revenues: The projected income, typically from taxes, grants, licenses, and fees, that the government anticipates collecting during the forthcoming fiscal period.
• Appropriations: The authorized expenditure limits established by a legislative body (e.g., city council, state legislature).
• Estimated Other Financing Sources/Uses: Anticipated inflows (sources) or outflows (uses) not classified strictly as revenues or expenditures, such as interfund transfers and bond proceeds.
• Budgetary Fund Balance: The difference between estimated revenues (plus other financing sources) and appropriations (plus other financing uses).
By recording these amounts at the inception of the budget year, governments can track the remaining unspent and unencumbered balance throughout the fiscal period.
An encumbrance, in governmental accounting, represents a commitment to purchase goods or services. It is set aside (or “encumbered”) to ensure that appropriated funds are designated for a specific purpose and will not be inadvertently spent elsewhere. Encumbrances are commonly recorded when a purchase order is issued or a contract is signed.
Encumbrances are typically recorded in the governmental fund at the issuance of a purchase order or the signing of a contract. Note that this action merely reserves the budgetary authority; it does not reflect a liability on a Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) basis.
When the goods or services are received and the actual expenditure (or accounts payable) is recognized, the related encumbrance is reversed. Thus, the transaction consists of two separate steps:
Suppose a municipal department issues a purchase order for $10,000 of office supplies. At the time of purchase order issuance:
• Debit Encumbrances – Supplies ……… $10,000
• Credit Budgetary Fund Balance – Reserve for Encumbrances ……… $10,000
Upon receipt of the supplies, assume the supplier invoice also amounts to $10,000:
• Debit Budgetary Fund Balance – Reserve for Encumbrances ……… $10,000
• Credit Encumbrances – Supplies ……… $10,000
Simultaneously, an expenditure entry is made:
• Debit Expenditures – Supplies ……… $10,000
• Credit Accounts Payable ……… $10,000
Because government funds use a modified accrual basis for accounting, the expenditure is recognized at the time the liability is incurred (receipt of goods), not at the time of actual cash disbursement.
Appropriations often carry a specified term, usually the government’s fiscal year. Depending on whether unspent funds can carry over to the next fiscal period, appropriations are categorized as either lapsing or nonlapsing:
“Lapsing” means that any unused appropriation authority (including remaining encumbrances) expires at the end of the fiscal year. These funds revert to the fund balance, and if the agency still requires the goods or services, it must request a new appropriation in the next cycle. Lapsing appropriations reinforce the principle that budgeted funds are to be used within the authorized timeframe.
“Nonlapsing” means the budgetary authority extends beyond the current fiscal period, allowing the government unit to carry over unspent funds to subsequent periods. Legislatures or governing bodies may authorize nonlapsing appropriations for certain long-term projects, capital improvement initiatives, or specific mandates that span multiple fiscal years.
Under lapsing appropriations, outstanding encumbrances typically must be closed (or “lapse”) at year-end. If a new appropriation is granted in the subsequent year, previously lapsed encumbrances may be re-established. For a nonlapsing appropriation, however, encumbrances can remain open beyond the fiscal year-end, eliminating the need to liquidate and re-encumber existing purchase orders or contracts.
Budgetary accounting is an internal control mechanism used in governmental fund-level accounting (e.g., General Fund, Special Revenue Funds). However, Government-Wide Financial Statements (as presented under GASB standards) are prepared using accrual accounting, and the concept of encumbrances is not recognized on the face of those statements. Instead, encumbrances appear as a budgetary control tool within the fund accounting framework.
Many governments prepare two sets of reports: one showing data on a budgetary (or “cash + encumbrances”) basis, and the other on a GAAP basis. Differences often arise when:
• Certain revenues recognized on a GAAP basis may not be recognized on a budgetary basis (e.g., accrual vs. cash).
• Encumbrances, recognized for budgetary control, are not recognized as expenditures on a GAAP basis until goods are received and a liability is incurred.
• Depreciation and certain other GAAP adjustments do not typically appear in budgetary reports.
In Chapter 21 (Reconciliations and Government-Wide Reporting), we address how governments reconcile net changes in fund balances on a budgetary basis to net changes in fund balances on a GAAP basis.
Below is a simple visual representation of the flow of budgetary authority, encumbrances, expenditures, and the lapsing or carryover decision:
flowchart LR A["Budget Adoption <br/>(Appropriations)"] --> B["Encumbrance <br/>Issued P.O. or Contract"] B --> C["Expenditure <br/>Recognize Liability <br/>Reverse Encumbrance"] C --> D["Payment <br/>Cash Disbursement"] D --> E["Year-End <br/>Evaluate Remaining <br/>Encumbrances"] E --> F["If Lapsing <br/>Close & Revert"] E --> G["If Nonlapsing <br/>Carry Forward"]
• Budget Adoption: Legislative body approves budget, establishing “Appropriations.”
• Encumbrance: Once a purchase order (P.O.) is issued or a contract is signed, funds are set aside.
• Expenditure: Upon receiving the good or service, the government recognizes an actual expenditure and a liability. The encumbrance is reversed.
• Payment: Settlement of the liability through cash disbursement or another form of payment (often recorded under modified accrual as a separate step).
• Year-End Evaluation: Determines the status of outstanding encumbrances. If the appropriation is lapsing, the balance reverts to the fund balance. If nonlapsing, the appropriation (and encumbrances) may carry forward.
This basic scenario shows how budgetary accounting and encumbrances allow jurisdictions to track committed, spent, and remaining budgetary authority at every step.
An encumbrance is not an actual expenditure. It is a reservation of funds. Expenditures should only be recognized when goods or services are received (under modified accrual, when a liability is incurred).
Certain line items appearing in budget-to-actual reports (i.e., encumbrances) do not match GAAP-based financial statements. Always ensure that the financial statement presentation reconciles any differences.
Governments must clear open encumbrances at year-end if the appropriation lapses. Failure to do so can lead to reporting errors and budgetary overstating.
Some appropriation statutes may carry ambiguous language, making it unclear whether funds truly are nonlapsing. Finance teams should confirm with legal counsel or legislative directives.
• Maintain updated policies outlining the process for recording and clearing encumbrances.
• Conduct periodic reviews of open encumbrances to ensure accuracy.
• Reconcile budgetary reports to GAAP-based financial statements to preserve clarity and transparency.
• Communicate the lapsing vs. nonlapsing status of appropriations to all relevant departments to prevent confusion or unintentional overspending.
For more details on budgetary accounting and encumbrances, consider exploring:
• Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) publications on best practices for fund accounting.
• GASB Codification Sections 1700 (The Financial Reporting Entity) and 2200 (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report).
• Chapter 21: Reconciliations and Government-Wide Reporting, which further discusses year-end adjustments and reconciliations.
Business Analysis and Reporting (BAR) CPA Mocks: 6 Full (1,500 Qs), Harder Than Real! In-Depth & Clear. Crush With Confidence!
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is for educational and preparatory purposes only.