Explore how the rapid adoption of cloud computing, mobile devices, and IoT technology impacts IT auditing, cybersecurity, and control evaluation. Learn about the shared responsibility model, mobile security measures, and the unique risks posed by IoT environments.
As technology evolves, organizations face a rapidly changing IT landscape. From moving critical systems and data to the cloud, to enabling a highly mobile workforce, to deploying interconnected Internet of Things (IoT) devices, businesses reap major benefits while encountering new and complex risks. In this section, we examine how these emerging environments challenge traditional audit approaches and require new methods for evaluating IT controls and cybersecurity.
Cloud computing allows organizations to provision infrastructure, platforms, and software on-demand using shared data centers maintained by external providers. This has proven transformative for cost-efficiency, scalability, and operational flexibility. Yet it also introduces fresh considerations in the auditing process.
• Public Cloud: Services such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform host resources for a multi-tenant user base. The provider is responsible for operating the infrastructure and maintaining many underlying security controls.
• Private Cloud: Dedicated infrastructure is hosted either on-premises or externally for a single organization. While data confidentiality may be easier to manage, the organization also retains direct responsibility for infrastructure-level controls.
• Hybrid Cloud: A blend of public and private clouds. Organizations choose to store sensitive data on private servers while leveraging public cloud services for less sensitive workloads or peak demand periods.
Under the shared responsibility model, the cloud provider is typically accountable for securing the physical infrastructure and hypervisor platform. The organization (the cloud customer) is responsible for controls at the application, user access, and data layers. For instance, while AWS secures its data centers and ensures host-level patch management, the customer oversees the operating system and database configurations within virtual machines.
The auditor should:
• Review the service-level agreements (SLAs) and contractual clauses to understand the division of responsibilities.
• Examine the organization’s controls over user permissions, encryption, data backup, and software patches.
• Assess the reliability of the cloud service provider’s controls by reviewing third-party assurance reports (e.g., SOC 1, SOC 2).
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating the layered approach of the shared responsibility model:
flowchart LR
A[Physical Data Center & Network] --> B[Virtualization Layer (Hypervisor)]
B --> C[Operating System & Middleware]
C --> D[Application & Data]
style A fill:#81B29A,color:#fff,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
style B fill:#F2CC8F,color:#fff,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
style C fill:#E07A5F,color:#fff,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
style D fill:#3D405B,color:#fff,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
subgraph Cloud Provider
A
B
end
subgraph Customer
C
D
end
Explanation:
• Cloud Provider (Green/Yellow Layers): Responsible for physical security and the hypervisor.
• Customer (Orange/Grey Layers): Responsible for operating system settings, software patches, data encryption, and application controls.
As employees increasingly use smartphones, tablets, and laptops for work, an organization’s attack surface expands. Remote access broadens potential entry points for cyber threats, making mobile device governance a critical audit concern.
• Unauthorized Access: Lost or stolen devices without passcode protections can leak sensitive company data.
• Insecure Wi-Fi Networks: Users connecting via public hotspots risk eavesdropping or man-in-the-middle attacks.
• Malware/Phishing Attacks: Mobile devices receive emails and text messages that can contain harmful links or attachments.
• BYOD (Bring Your Own Device): Personal devices often lack standardized configurations or adequate security controls.
Use Case Example:
A global retailer allows employees to process transactions using mobile point-of-sale (POS) devices. An audit reveals that some employees have turned off automatic OS updates, leaving their devices vulnerable to unpatched security flaws. The auditor advises enforcing centralized MDM policies that prohibit disabling updates, thereby reducing the threat of cyberattacks on POS systems.
IoT networks connect everyday devices—ranging from sensors and cameras to smart home systems and industrial machinery—enabling seamless data collection and remote control. While this revolutionizes operational insight and efficiency, it also creates new attack vectors.
• Data Collection: IoT devices continuously capture data (e.g., temperature, movement, energy consumption).
• Data Transmission: Often sent through wireless or limited-bandwidth connections that may not use robust encryption.
• Data Processing: IoT data may be aggregated in the cloud or local edge servers for analytics and real-time decisions.
• Device Vulnerabilities: Many IoT devices run lightweight operating systems that may lack built-in security controls or patching mechanisms.
Practical Example:
In a manufacturing plant, IoT sensors track machine temperatures. A hacker might spoof temperature readings to manipulate production lines and damage equipment. Auditors look for encryption on sensor transmissions and real-time anomaly detection to catch suspicious signals.
• Shared Responsibility Model: A framework defining which security tasks are handled by the cloud provider and which are managed by the customer.
• Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): A security process requiring at least two forms of identification, such as a password plus a facial scan, one-time code, or token.
• IoT (Internet of Things): A connected ecosystem of physical devices—often embedded with sensors and wired or wireless connectivity—that can exchange data and interact with systems.
• Best Practices:
• Common Pitfalls:
• Strategies to Overcome Challenges:
• Regulations and Guidelines:
– NIST SP 800-145: Foundational guidance from the National Institute of Standards and Technology on cloud security attributes.
– ISO 27017 and ISO 27018 for cloud-specific security controls.
• Institutions and Professional Bodies:
– ISACA: Offers valuable frameworks, including “Auditing IoT Ecosystems: Best Practices.”
– AICPA: Provides SOC 2 guidelines specific to cloud environments and data security.
• Books and Official Publications:
– “AWS Security Best Practices” (Amazon Whitepapers)
– “Securing the Internet of Things” by various authors—covers designing end-to-end security models.
• Online Courses:
– “Cloud Security and Governance” on Coursera (focus on fundamental and advanced cloud security).
– “IoT Security Fundamentals” from SANS Institute—delves into device-level security, threat modeling, and common vulnerabilities.
Auditing & Attestation CPA Mock Exams (AUD): Comprehensive Prep
• Tackle full-length mock exams designed to mirror real AUD questions—from risk assessment and ethics to internal control and substantive procedures.
• Refine your exam-day strategies with detailed, step-by-step solutions for every scenario.
• Explore in-depth rationales that reinforce understanding of higher-level concepts, giving you a decisive edge on test day.
• Boost confidence and reduce exam anxiety by building mastery of the wide-ranging AUD blueprint.
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is created solely for educational and preparatory purposes.