Related Parties: Identification and Disclosure Requirements

11.2 Related Parties: Identification and Disclosure Requirements

Related party transactions often involve a greater degree of risk than other transactions because of the potential for preferential treatment, fraudulent manipulation, or errors in recording and disclosure. This section takes a deep dive into defining related parties, their associated risks, and the strategies auditors employ to identify, evaluate, and disclose these transactions in financial statements.

1. Definition and Risk

Related parties are individuals or entities that have the ability to influence or be influenced by the entity in question, often as a result of familial, managerial, ownership, or investment relationships. Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), specifically FASB ASC 850, and other standards worldwide (e.g., IFRS IAS 24), these parties include:

• Subsidiaries and controlled affiliates.
• Major shareholders with substantial influence.
• Directors, executive management, and their families.
• Special purpose entities or nominee entities established for specific purposes.

Because related parties may not always transact at arm’s length, there is a heightened fraud risk and potential for misstatement in financial statements. Management might conceal related party relationships or structure transactions to avoid clearly disclosing the economic substance of the arrangements.

2. Identification Procedures

2.1 Review Corporate Documents and Communications

Auditors should begin by examining the following sources for clues about related party relationships and potential conflicts of interest: • Board of directors’ meeting minutes.
• Shareholder meeting minutes.
• Conflict-of-interest statements signed by directors and senior management.
• Loan agreements, especially those with unusual terms.
• Legal counsel communications regarding corporate reorganizations, lawsuits, or mergers.

2.2 Inquiries of Management and Those Charged with Governance

Direct, pointed questioning of management and oversight bodies is also critical for unearthing potential undisclosed relationships: • Ask about board members’ affiliations with vendors, suppliers, or customers.
• Investigate any family relationships involving high-ranking officials.
• Inquire about reorganizations, restructurings, or capital injections that could introduce new related parties.

2.3 Cross-Check Corporate and Regulatory Records

Auditing teams can verify information by comparing it with external databases or regulatory filings: • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings that may indicate beneficial ownership.
• Business or trade registers to confirm ownership details.
• Corporate bylaws and share registries that specify equity interests and voting rights.

These procedures help ensure the completeness and accuracy of related party identification, guarding against intentional or unintentional omission.

3. Substance over Form

One of the central principles in evaluating related party transactions is to look beyond the legal form of an arrangement and focus on its economic substance, often referred to as the “substance over form” principle. This is particularly crucial where: • Entities are set up under nominee names or shell companies.
• Management has partial indirect ownership in enterprises supplying goods or services to the company.
• Transactions are masked through intermediaries.

Even when documentation or corporate structures seem to distance the parties involved, auditors must remain vigilant to recognize when the substance of a transaction reveals a related party relationship.

    flowchart LR
	    A[Company A] -->|Ownership/Control| B[Subsidiary X]
	    A -->|Significant Shareholder with Family Ties| C[Family Member Entity]
	    A -->|Subsidiary's Non-Arm's-Length Transactions| D[Third-Party Vendor]

In this simplified diagram, Company A directly owns Subsidiary X. There may also be indirect relationships with a “Family Member Entity” or even a “Third-Party Vendor” that are actually under significant influence (though not immediately obvious). The dotted lines represent potential hidden relationships that require deeper inquiry and confirmation.

4. Disclosure Review

4.1 Assessing Financial Statement Footnotes

Related party transactions often have specific disclosure requirements, such as: • The nature of the relationship (e.g., parent-subsidiary, common ownership, family relationship).
• Description of the transaction (e.g., loans, sales, services).
• Dollar amounts or other relevant measures.
• Outstanding balances at period-end, if any.
• Important terms and conditions, such as interest rates on related party loans.

The objective is to ensure that users of financial statements are able to assess the potential financial effects and risks arising from these relationships. Failure to disclose or under-disclose related party transactions can significantly distort financial results.

4.2 Evaluating Completeness and Clarity

In addition to confirming the presence of necessary disclosures, auditors should evaluate whether those disclosures are: • Understandable and adequately summarize the relationships and any material risks.
• Free from misleading information, such as incorrect amounts or incomplete terms.
• Aligned with the applicable financial reporting framework (FASB ASC 850 in the U.S., IFRS IAS 24 internationally).

Any discrepancies discovered typically warrant further inquiry, expanded testing, and potential communication with those charged with governance.

5. Best Practices and Key Considerations

1. Develop a comprehensive related party risk assessment.
2. Continually update the audit file with new findings from inquiries, board minutes, or regulatory data.
3. Utilize data analytics to identify anomalies in transactions, vendor listings, and payment records.
4. Engage specialists or legal counsel if complex structures or foreign jurisdictions are involved.
5. Ensure all identified related parties are formally documented, with any high-risk transactions subjected to expanded procedures.

By maintaining professional skepticism and thoroughly corroborating management’s representations, auditors can help ensure that financial statements fairly reflect the full range of related party relationships.

6. Common Pitfalls and Potential Challenges

• Overreliance on management’s oral representations without obtaining corroborative evidence.
• Failure to identify less visible arrangements, such as intermediaries or special purpose vehicles.
• Overlooking family relationships or personal ties that do not appear on official company documents.
• Insufficient scrutiny of complex structures involving multiple levels of ownership.

Staying alert to these pitfalls will strengthen the audit approach and reduce the likelihood of material misstatements.

7. Practical Examples

• Example 1: A Company “Alpha Inc.” obtains a loan from “Beta LLC” at a below-market interest rate. Beta LLC is 51% owned by Alpha Inc.’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Even though Beta LLC is not legally a subsidiary, the CFO’s controlling interest makes it a related party transaction.
• Example 2: A family member of a board director owns 40% of a vendor. The prices for goods sold are consistently 15% above market rates, indicating a non-arm’s-length transaction. Such a scenario must be clearly disclosed in the financial statements under the relevant frameworks.

These real-world scenarios highlight the importance of thorough identification and scrutiny of all entities and individuals that might present a conflict of interest.

8. References and Resources

Official References

• AU-C Section 550: “Related Parties” (AICPA).
• FASB ASC 850: “Related Party Disclosures” (U.S. GAAP).
• IFRS IAS 24: “Related Party Disclosures” (International).

Additional Resources

• PCAOB Staff Practice Alert on undisclosed related parties.
• SEC Filings (e.g., proxy statements, 10-K, 8-K) that may reveal beneficial ownership and financial arrangements.
• Industry guides on best practices for related party governance and disclosure.

Mastering Related Party Disclosures: Key Concepts Quiz

For Additional Practice and Deeper Preparation

Auditing & Attestation CPA Mock Exams (AUD): Comprehensive Prep
• Tackle full-length mock exams designed to mirror real AUD questions—from risk assessment and ethics to internal control and substantive procedures.
• Refine your exam-day strategies with detailed, step-by-step solutions for every scenario.
• Explore in-depth rationales that reinforce understanding of higher-level concepts, giving you a decisive edge on test day.
• Boost confidence and reduce exam anxiety by building mastery of the wide-ranging AUD blueprint.

Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is created solely for educational and preparatory purposes.