Learn how to identify and address key risks in revenue and receipts cycles for CPA AUD. Explore best practices for substantive testing, cut-off testing, confirmations, and more.
The Revenue and Receipts Cycles are critical areas in an audit of financial statements. Because revenue often represents one of the largest figures reported, it carries heightened inherent and fraud risk. External auditors must design and perform procedures to validate the occurrence, completeness, accuracy, and timing of recorded revenue transactions, as well as the proper recording of related cash receipts. In this section, we will explore common risks, substantive tests of details, analytical procedures, and best practices for evaluating revenues and receipts.
Revenue usually constitutes an essential measure of a company’s performance and can significantly impact financial statement users’ decisions. When investors and creditors look at a company’s financial health, they frequently begin by analyzing revenue trends. Because of its substantial effect, revenue is often a prime target for manipulation. Hence, ensuring that revenue and cash receipts are materially correct and appropriately recognized is a key focus for auditors.
Auditors must be on guard for any attempt to inflate revenues, which could be done through:
• Recording fictitious or nonexistent sales.
• Recognizing revenue before product shipment or service performance (“bill-and-hold” scenarios or premature recognition).
Such misstatements distort financial results and can mislead users into overestimating profitability.
Mismanagement of transaction cut-offs can lead to recognizing income in the wrong period:
• Recording December shipments in January to smooth earnings artificially.
• Including shipments made in January in December’s financials to boost year-end revenue.
Cut-off issues often arise close to period ends, where pressure to meet targets can lead to errors.
Depending on the strength of internal controls, individuals could misappropriate incoming funds by:
• Diverting remittances into personal accounts.
• Offering unauthorized credits or refunds to disguise theft.
• Failing to record cash receipts entirely.
Mixing or lacking segregation of duties between receiving payments, recording, and reconciling bank statements raises the risk of cash fraud.
Below is a simplified diagram illustrating the flow of the revenue process, from order placement to receipt of cash:
flowchart LR A[Customer Places Order] --> B[Order Entry / Approval] B --> C[Shipping / Delivery] C --> D[Invoicing / Billing] D --> E[Recording Sales & Receivables] E --> F[Customer Payment Received] F --> G[Cash Receipt Processing / Bank Deposit] G --> H[Update of A/R Ledgers & General Ledger]
Auditors select a sample of recorded sales transactions from the sales journal and trace them back to underlying documents, such as:
• Shipping documents or bills of lading.
• Customer purchase orders or contracts.
• Sales invoices.
This process tests the existence/occurrence assertion, ensuring that recorded sales actually occurred. If documentation does not support the transaction, it could indicate an overstatement.
Sending confirmation letters to a sample of customers, in accordance with AU-C Section 505, is a highly reliable form of audit evidence to validate:
• The existence of recorded receivables.
• The accuracy of amounts due from customers.
Discrepancies or non-responses require additional follow-up, such as subsequent cash receipt reviews.
Because revenue recognition hinges on the timing of transactions, auditors perform cut-off tests near the period end. They examine shipping documents and sales invoices for transactions recorded in the final (and initial) days of the audit period, confirming that entries are:
• Recognized in the correct fiscal period.
• Not manipulated to boost or defer revenue.
Auditors evaluate credit memos and return authorizations to ensure they:
• Appropriately reduce revenue when valid customer returns occur.
• Are properly approved and recorded.
• Do not disguise fraudulent activities (e.g., stolen cash receipts).
Analytical procedures often complement tests of details for revenue and receipts because they can be efficient and identify anomalies:
Auditors trace recorded totals of cash receipts to daily bank deposits. Inconsistencies, such as frequent or unexplained shortages, may reveal employment of lapping schemes or other misappropriations.
Auditors select samples of deposit slips and compare them to recorded receipts in the cash receipts journal. Where lockbox systems exist, the auditor reviews lockbox statements to ensure that all customer remittances are included and promptly recorded.
Excessive amounts of overdue accounts might be a signal of:
• Recording sales where collection is unlikely to happen.
• Weak credit controls.
• Potential uncollectible balances that management has not written off appropriately.
• A manufacturing company (ABC Manufacturing) saw its Q4 revenues spike by 20% compared to previous quarters without a corresponding increase in production or market demand. An auditor’s analytical procedures identified the spike as unusual. Substantive tests pointed to premature revenue recognition on orders scheduled for production in the following quarter.
• In a retail chain (RetailCo), the auditor discovered that an employee responsible for depositing checks was diverting some customer payments to a personal account. Lack of segregation of duties (no separate individual reconciling daily deposits) allowed the scheme to remain undetected for months. Once separate employees were assigned to handle incoming payments and reconcile bank statements, the fraud was discovered.
• Evaluate Internal Controls Early: Strong IT controls, segregation of duties, and authorization policies help reduce risks in revenue reporting and cash handling.
• Perform Timely Cut-Off Procedures: End-of-period transactions are especially prone to manipulation, so close attention is essential.
• Incorporate Predictive Analytics: Estimating expected revenue or cash inflows and comparing them to actuals offers a powerful way to identify anomalies.
• Maintain Professional Skepticism: Challenge unusual revenue patterns or timely spikes, particularly when management offers limited or vague explanations.
• Follow Up on Unusual Customer Confirmations: Any customer disputes or non-responses demand careful attention to confirm the validity of outstanding receivables.
• AU-C Section 330: “Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks.”
• AU-C Section 505: “External Confirmations.”
• “AICPA Audit Guide: Revenue Recognition” – Incorporates considerations for ASC 606.
• Industry-specific revenue recognition guides (e.g., software, retail, manufacturing).
Auditing & Attestation CPA Mock Exams (AUD): Comprehensive Prep
• Tackle full-length mock exams designed to mirror real AUD questions—from risk assessment and ethics to internal control and substantive procedures.
• Refine your exam-day strategies with detailed, step-by-step solutions for every scenario.
• Explore in-depth rationales that reinforce understanding of higher-level concepts, giving you a decisive edge on test day.
• Boost confidence and reduce exam anxiety by building mastery of the wide-ranging AUD blueprint.
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is created solely for educational and preparatory purposes.